Sunday, 9 June 2013

Champagne Gaston Collard

This was a tiny producer (1.75 ha) which was located on the same street as our gite. We popped in whilst walking past to see whether we could get a tasting. At the time we went in they were busy bottling some wines so the producer asked if we could come back later that afternoon. Later, whilst we were walking back to our gite the producer saw us and ran down the road after us to offer us a tasting. Unusual dedication! (particularly given the rather lacklustre attitude of some other producers on the same road e.g. Fromentin-Laclepart, who just couldn't be bothered to offer a tasting when we came to visit!). This producer was the only one we visited that day which made noticeable use of MALO. Really interesting to see the difference it makes after a day of so much wine without it.

Unlike almost all the other producers whose English was pretty rudimentary (although, clearly, much better than my French!) excellent English was spoken here. The producer has recently taken over from his father. From his comments it appears that he has different ideas about how the wines should be made... so these tasting notes might end up being out of date pretty soon (many of these wines were from vintages where his father was still in charge).

Since this place is so tiny it has no real marketing and totally relies on word of mouth. It was really good and some of it was ridiculously good value. So, I can strongly recommend this place.

1. Brut
90% Pinot Noir, 10% Chardonnay. 10g of sugar/litre.

Lots of apple on the nose. Soft mouthfeel. Soft mousse. Some bready notes. This is perhaps a little simple, but very effective. This has length without the taste changing - no sourness on the finish, it just stays good until the end. At 13.50 EUR it's just ridiculously good value.

2. Rose
90% White wine, 10% red wine. 10g of sugar/litre.

Very pale salmon colour. Crisp acid, explosive mousse. A simple, but good, rose.

3. Grand Cru, Prestige Cuvee
Only made from old-vine grapes. 6g of sugar/litre. I'm a bit vague as to whether this was a vintage or not. I've got 2008 written down, but maybe that was year it was blended..?

Really fruity - cooked apple most noticeable. Honey, nuts. Like a wine that happens to be sparkling rather than a usual sparkling wine. Very powerful. This was very recently disgorged (not actually released yet) so the liqueur is a little noticeable - perhaps a little more viscous than it normally would be. Should be fully integrated soon. Excellent stuff.

4. Bouzy Rouge
We tried two wines here. One was made in the years when his father was in charge, but was one where he had convinced his father not to filter the wine. The other was a more recent vintage where he was fully in control.

The wines were mainly of academic interest... much in the same way that reds from Alsace are. Very good still pinot noir for the region, but even so it's not really my cup of tea.

Champagne Camille Saves

This was the only producer with whom we had booked a tasting for a specific time... unusually go-with-the-flow for my wine tasting holidays! You really don't need to book at most places in Bouzy - at least for this time of year. Having said that, the tasting here was excellent and very generous. Also, the wines were excellent. So glad we went here.

1. Carte Blanche 1er Cru
75% Pinot Noir, 25% Chardonnay. 9g of sugar / litre. Made from a blend of 2008 and 2009 wines.

Definite pinot noir style nose. Good mouthfilling stuff. Crisp, appley acid dominates. Honeyed notes on the finish. Quite long, with a sour yet pleasant finish.

2. Carte d'Or
Again a 75-25 blend. Made from a blend of 2008 and 2007 wines.

Quite an intense nose. Cooked apple, honey. Lots of yeast autolysis notes. Crisp apple acid. Quite refined but powerful too. Really serious stuff.

3. Brut Cuvee Prestige
Didn't note down the cepage. Mixture of 2006, 2007 wines.

This sample feels like it's been open too long. Very good though despite this. Intense palate, more so than previous one. Great length. However, in the end there's not quite enough to justify paying more for this than for the previous wine.

4. Cuvee Extra Brut
Blend of 2007 and 2008 wines. This is not quite zero dosage (4g of sugar/litre). However, it has the usual problem I find with all zero dosage wines... just lacks the body that comes with a small amount of dosage - feels like a waste of a wine. This was the only one I didn't like from this producer.

5. 2007 Vintage
80% Pinot Noir, 20% Chardonnay. 7g of sugar / litre.

Very fine bubbles. Refined nose. Rich biscuity notes. Towards the English taste. Lots of yeast autolysis notes. Very good.

6. Cuvee Anais Jolicoeur 2008
90% Pinot Noir, 10% Chardonnay.

Very fine bubbles. Very elegant, but still with plenty of oomph. Base wine aged in barrique - some new, some old. Really pleasant wine.

7. Rose
60% Chardonnay, 28% Pinot Noir, 12% Bouzy Rouge

Very crisp acidity... presumably from the high Chardonnay content. Delicate red fruit. Some tannin noticeable. Well balanced - I liked this quite a lot.

Champagne Barnaut

A very brief tasting in the Barnaut shop whilst en route to Camille Saves. A little underwhelming - nothing wrong, but felt that many other wines we tasted were better at the same or lower prices.

1. Grande Reserve Brut
2/3 Pinot Noir, 1/3 Chardonnay. 6g of sugar/litre

Have seen some people online complaining about tired samples from bottles which had clearly been open too long. No such problems here - this was a freshly opened bottle. Crisp acid, lots of lemon. An aperitif-style wine. Well balanced and elegant. Very pleasant, but the Jean-Baptiste Martin was better at the same price.

2. Cuvee Edmond Vintage 2007
40% Pinot Noir, 40% Chardonnay, 20% Pinot Meunier.

Much deeper colour than the previous wine. This tastes too young - finish way too sour. Needs time.

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Champagne Jean-Baptiste Martin

This was a huge find... the type of place where you half feel like not telling anyone about it. Whilst carrying some wine back to the gite from the Jean Vesselle tasting we took a random detour and just popped into the first Champagne house which caught our eye. So glad we did!

This place did not feel set up for tourists at all. We ended up buying 18 bottles... but they only had 6 bottles in stock and had to send someone off to collect extra from their cellars in Verzenay (I think). And then the card machine hadn't been used in so long it wasn't charged, and they had to dig out the instruction manual to try to get it working. Very charming, and makes you wonder how the economics of the situation work out.

1. Cuvee Lucie Martin
80% Pinot Noir, 20% Chardonnay

Medium gold colour. Very good biscuity, bready nose. Very elegant. Crisp, fine mousse. Manages to be both delicate and powerful. The finest we've tasted so far. I bought quite a few of these.

2. Rose
90% Pinot Noir, 10% Chardonnay

Interesting nose. Slight jammy notes on the finish. This is more towards the end of the rose spectrum where you would probably mistake it for a white if tasted blind. Nice, and I bought some, but the Cuvee Lucie Martin is by far my favourite.

Champagne Jean Vesselle

An odd one this. The estate was much more set up for tasting than most we visited and seemed much busier too. However, the wines were pretty underwhelming. Not sure why this one appears more popular with tourists. It just goes to show the poor relationship between popularity/price and quality with grower Champagnes.

1. Cuvee Prestige
70% Pinot Noir, 30% Chardonnay. 9g of sugar/litre

Good but nothing special. Light, quite elegant. The main problem is tasting it after the Maurice Vesselle extravaganza just before.

Now that my palate is reacclimatising this wine has grown on me. However, it just feels a little underwhelming - at the price there are many better wines we tasted... all available within a few hundred metres!

2. Cuvee Brut Reserve
80% Pinot Noir, 20% Chardonnay

Funny nose (I really didn't like it). However, on the palate I prefer this to the previous one. It feels "rougher" than the previous wine... However, the previous wine felt like it was trying, and failing, to be something it wasn't. This was feels honest.

3. Brut Oeil de Perdrix
100% Pinot Noir
This name means "Eye of the partridge", similarly to the Tuscan Vin Santo. This wine had a very light pink colour, floral notes and unusual texture. Good acid and length. Feels like more of a food wine.

Monday, 3 June 2013

Champagne Maurice Vesselle

This was the first place where we just rocked up and asked for a tasting. So glad we did - the choice of this place was quite arbitrary, yet it turned out to be a great success. Generous tasting and great wines. The person giving our tasting spoke a little English, but was happy to conduct a tasting aided by plenty of gesticulation.

1. Cuvee Reserve Brut
80% Pinot Noir, 20% Chardonnay
A blend made in 2007 from the following vintages: 2004, 2006, 2007.

Very good. Made towards the English style (gout anglais I think they call it). Rich, powerful, honeyed. Grilled peaches. Good length... perhaps the finish might be a little too sweet if you drank a lot of it, but in the tasting this is excellent. Later note: we had a bottle of this as a pre-prandial drink that evening, this was not true at all. This is very good. At 17.50 EUR it's also a bargain!

2. 2004 Vintage
50-50 Pinot Noir, Chardonnay blend.
Acidity much more noticeable than the previous wine. More lifted and floral and refined. This sample is a little tired - the bottle feels as though it's been open too long. Dried apricots on the palate. Sour apple finish.
Cost: 23.50 EUR.

3. 2000 Vintage
85% Pinot Noir, 15% Chardonnay.

Rich nose. Honey, nuts, stewed apple on the nose. Crisp acid on the palate. Well balanced, sour note on the finish is much less prominent. I wonder how much of this was vintage variation and how much is simply the extra age..? This is good for drinking now, but will improve with age. This is really very good.
Also 23.50 EUR.

4. 1998 Vintage
80% Pinot Noir, 20% Chardonnay.
This sample has apparently been open for 5 days.

Intense "English style". Rich, mouthfilling. Nuts, almost mushroomy character on the nose and palate. Really long-lived on the palate.
More expensive at 55 EUR.

5. 1988 Vintage
Didn't get the cepage for this one.

Acidity still quite noticeable, more so than the previous wine... even though it's 10 years older. Amazing nose. Very serious contemplation wine. Really intense. Good to know that the vintages will age so well.
Cost: 100 EUR.

6. 2008 Vintage Rose
100% Pinot Noir, Maceration style.

Good soft, red fruit aromas. However, on the palate it feels like it would come across like a white Champagne if tasted blind. A little on the softer side than the whites.

Champagne Herbert Beaufort

This was attached to the Gite where we stayed. First tasting of the day at 9:30am!

1. Cuvee du Melomane, Blanc de Blanc
Delicate, bready, lemon, grapefruit. Very acidic. Good length.

2. Carte d'Or Grand Cru
90% Pinot Noir, 10% Chardonnay
Very noticeable acid. More intense and fuller bodied than previous. Lemon, some strawberry notes on finish. Good length.

3. 2008 Vintage
50% Pinot Noir, 50% Chardonnay. Approx 10% of their production goes into this. There was no vintage in 2007, previous one was 2006.

Lifted, somewhat floral nose. Yeast autolysis. Very elegant. Some complexity, although green apple is the main aroma.

4. Rose "Cuvee Yllen"
100% Pinot Noir. Macerated, not blended, rose.

Very noticeable strawberry on the nose and palate. Not one of the roses which would taste like a white Champagne if tasted blind. Good acid, good structure. Long, with pleasant finish. This was my favourite from this producer.